Karuna Labs
A Clinical Handbook · v1.0
For chronic pain · clinicians & patients

The Predictive Mind in Pain

A psychotherapy & neuroscience handbook for psychophysiologic disorders.

For clinicians, therapists, and patients working with chronic pain, fibromyalgia, non-structural back pain, tension headache, functional GI disorders, and other mind–body (neuroplastic) conditions.

PRIOR EVIDENCE PERCEPT ACTION
Karuna Labs  ·  Conceptual adaptation
Built on Chapters III & IV
of Vasubandhu's Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam
(Pruden English translation)
Prologue

How to Read This Handbook

This is not a book of Buddhism, and it is not a literal commentary on a 5th-century text. It is a clinical translation.

We have taken the conceptual architecture of one of the most rigorous maps of mind ever produced — Vasubandhu's Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam — and rebuilt it in the vocabulary a modern pain clinician actually uses: the brain as a prediction machine, pain as a constructed inference, and recovery as the retraining of a generative model.

The Abhidharma asked a question that turns out to be the central question of psychophysiologic medicine: where does experience come from? Its answer — that what we take to be a solid, external world is in fact assembled, moment by moment, out of conditions, expectations, and habits — is startlingly close to what computational neuroscience now calls predictive processing. This handbook exploits that closeness on purpose.

Three color conventions used throughout
Source term
An idea borrowed from the Abhidharma, in rust italics.
e.g. vedanā
Clinical translation
The modern neuroscience or psychotherapy equivalent, in sage.
e.g. a precision-weighted percept
Practice boxes
Sand-colored panels give the therapist or patient something to actually do.
→ See ch. 4, 6, 9
An important clinical boundary

This framework applies to psychophysiologic (neuroplastic) symptoms — real, often severe symptoms generated by a sensitized nervous system rather than by ongoing tissue damage. It is never a substitute for medical evaluation. Red-flag symptoms, structural disease, and undiagnosed pain must be assessed by a physician first. Saying "the brain generates this pain" never means "the pain is imaginary." The pain is entirely real; what is in question is its source.

IPart One

The world is built, not found.

The foundational thesis, and why a sensitized nervous system behaves exactly as the Abhidharma predicted a conditioned mind would.

01 Chapter One

"The Variety of the World Arises from Action."

Chapter IV of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam opens with a single line that, read through a clinical lens, is the entire thesis of this handbook.

Vasubandhu means that the bewildering diversity of experienced worlds — pleasant and painful, vivid and dull — is not handed to a passive observer from the outside. It is produced, assembled out of the accumulated activity (karma) of the perceiving system itself.

Predictive processing makes the same claim in different words. The brain is not a camera passively recording a pre-existing world; it is a generative model that actively constructs experience by predicting the causes of its sensory input and continually correcting those predictions. What you feel — including pain — is the brain's best running hypothesis about the state of the body, not a direct readout of the tissues.

The central translation
Karma · the world arising from action
the perceived world as the output of an active generative model.

In both systems, the experienced world is an effect, not a given. This is why pain can be intense and entirely real while the tissues are healthy: the output of the model can be loud even when the sensory evidence feeding it is quiet.

Vasubandhu immediately anticipates an objection that every pain patient feels: if the world is built by my own system, why does it produce something as unwanted as suffering? His answer is that a system whose activity is "a mixture of good and bad" produces "bodies resembling abscesses" alongside objects of relief — a vivid 5th-century image of a nervous system that has learned to generate both the alarm and the craving for its remedy. The clinical equivalent is the sensitized predictive loop: a brain that has, through repetition, come to predict danger in the body and then organizes the whole of experience around that prediction.

1.1   Predictive coding in one page

Strip predictive processing to its mechanism and four claims remain:

  1. The brain runs a model. It maintains expectations ("priors") about what is causing its sensory signals.
  2. Perception is prediction plus correction. What you consciously feel is the prediction, updated by the mismatch between prediction and incoming signal ("prediction error").
  3. Precision decides the winner. The brain weights prediction and evidence by their estimated reliability ("precision"). A high-precision prior can override the senses; high-precision evidence can override a prior.
  4. Action closes the loop. The system can change its predictions, or it can act on the world (and the body) to make the predictions come true — this is active inference.
Top-down prediction PRIOR Bottom-up signal EVIDENCE Compare · weight by precision SPARŚA · CONTACT vedanā · the percept
Prediction
Evidence
Percept

Chronic psychophysiologic pain is, in this language, a model that has settled into a high-precision prior of bodily threat — a prediction of danger so strongly weighted that it dominates the actual sensory evidence from healthy tissue. The Abhidharma had a name for precisely this condition of a prediction overriding reality. It called it avidyā, ignorance.

Why this map helps a patient

Patients are routinely told their pain is "structural" (a back problem, a nerve problem). When imaging is clean, this leaves them feeling dismissed. The predictive model offers a third option that is neither damage nor imaginary:

The pain is a real output of a system that has learned a false prediction. That reframe — mechanistic, blameless, and changeable — is itself therapeutic, because a prediction known to be a prediction loses precision.

"
The output of the model can be loud even when the sensory evidence feeding it is quiet.
— Chapter 1 · The central translation
02 Chapter Two

Ignorance as a Faulty Prior.

The Abhidharma is unusually careful about what avidyā actually is.

Vasubandhu rejects the lazy reading that ignorance is mere absence of information. Ignorance, he insists, is a positive, active mental factor — "a separate dharma," a force with its own causal power, not just a hole where knowledge should be. He compares it to an enemy or a falsehood: not the lack of a friend, but the presence of an adversary.

This is exactly the clinical point that maladaptive pain is not an information deficit. The patient often knows, intellectually, that their scan is clean. Telling them so again changes nothing, because a faulty prior is not corrected by facts presented to the conscious mind. The prior is an active generative commitment of the system, weighted with high precision, operating beneath awareness. In predictive-coding terms, avidyā is a high-precision but inaccurate prior — a confident wrong guess about the causes of bodily sensation that the brain defends against contradicting evidence.

Abhidharma termClinical translation
avidyā (ignorance)
A high-precision, inaccurate prior — a confident, false model of bodily danger held beneath awareness.
ayoniso manasikāra (incorrect attention)
Biased attentional sampling — the system preferentially samples and weights evidence that confirms the threat prediction (attentional bias, hypervigilance).
moha (delusion, aberration)
The felt certainty that the constructed percept is a direct readout of reality — the model mistaking its own output for the world.

Vasubandhu makes a remark that could be lifted directly into a pain-neuroscience lecture. He notes that "incorrect judgment" (ayoniso manasikāra) is "produced at the moment of contact" — that is, the bias does its work at the very instant sensation is assembled, not afterward. Modern attention research says the same: hypervigilant, threat-biased sampling shapes the percept as it forms, upweighting nociceptive prediction error before the experience reaches awareness. The distortion is upstream of the feeling, which is why "just think positively about the pain" arrives far too late.

Clinical reading

Ignorance is not stupidity and not denial. It is a confident, automatic, body-level prediction. Effective therapy does not argue with it; it

(a) lowers its precision — reduces how much the brain trusts the danger prediction, and

(b) supplies high-quality disconfirming evidence — under conditions safe enough for the brain to actually update.

Parts Three and Four are entirely about how to do these two things.

IIPart Two

The twelve-link cascade.

Dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) read as the step-by-step assembly of a chronic-pain episode — and as a map of where treatment can intervene.

03 Chapter Three

Dependent Origination: the Generative Cascade.

The most famous structure in the Abhidharma is the twelve-fold chain of pratītyasamutpādadependent origination — the sequence by which suffering is built link by link, each link conditioning the next. Vasubandhu treats it not as a myth of cosmic rebirth but as a precise causal analysis: nothing in experience arises on its own; everything arises in dependence on conditions. Remove a condition and what depended on it cannot form.

Read as a clinician, the chain is a generative cascade: the staged process by which a healthy nervous system manufactures a persistent pain experience and then locks it in. Each classical link maps onto a recognizable stage of predictive processing, and — crucially — each link is a candidate intervention point. The promise of dependent origination is also the promise of pain-reprocessing therapy: the chain can be interrupted, and it tends to break at the links you can reach.

Link 12 feeds back to link 1 — the chain is circular

Two features of the classical analysis matter enormously for treatment. First, the chain is circular, not linear: link 12 feeds back to link 1, each completed episode strengthening the ignorance that begins the next. This is the clinical pain–fear–pain spiral. Second, Vasubandhu is explicit that the chain is held together by conditions that are themselves impermanent — which is precisely why it can be unwound.

The two hinge links · where therapy lives

Vasubandhu singles out two junctions as decisive. We will spend whole chapters on each because they are the most clinically reachable points in the entire cascade:

  • Contact → Sensation (links 6–7). Where the prediction is compared to evidence and the percept is built. Intervene here by changing precision — the core of pain-reprocessing and graded exposure.
  • Sensation → Craving (links 7–8). Where a feeling becomes a reactive urge. Vasubandhu says this link is optional, and that single insight is the hinge of mindfulness-based pain therapy.
04 Chapter Four · the first hinge

Contact: where prediction meets evidence.

In the chain, sparśa (contact) is the meeting of three things: a sense base, its object, and consciousness. The Abhidharma defines it as the coming-together from which feeling is born — the junction where raw afferent signal and the perceiving mind make contact and a percept becomes possible.

Predictive coding sharpens this into a mechanism. Contact is the comparison operation: the point where the model's top-down prediction meets the bottom-up sensory evidence and the difference between them — the prediction error — is computed. Everything downstream depends on this comparison and, above all, on how the two inputs are weighted.

Vasubandhu's most clinically electric observation appears right here. He argues that sensation becomes a cause of suffering "only when it is defiled, associated with ignorance." Contact that is "not accompanied by error" — the contact of one free from avidyā — does not generate the painful, craving-producing sensation at all. The same afferent signal, met by an accurate model, yields a neutral or manageable percept; met by a faulty, fearful prior, it yields suffering.

The mechanism of precision

Same signal, two outcomes. When the danger prior is weighted as highly reliable, the brain treats benign interoceptive noise as high-confidence evidence of harm and the percept is amplified into pain. When the prior's precision is lowered — the brain stops trusting the danger prediction — the identical signal is downweighted and the percept softens or vanishes.

"Contact accompanied by ignorance"
high-precision threat prior dominating sensory evidence at the comparison stage.

This is why two people with identical scans, or one person on two different days, can have radically different pain. The tissue evidence is similar; the prior, and the precision assigned to it, is not. It also explains the clinical workhorses directly: pain reprocessing works by repeatedly demonstrating safety so the brain lowers the precision of the danger prior; graded exposure works by feeding the model disconfirming evidence (movement without catastrophe) until the prediction updates.

Practice · Somatic tracking at the point of contact

Meet the sensation where the percept is built.

A core pain-reprocessing technique, framed through sparśa:

  1. Attend lightly to the sensation without trying to change it — observe the raw signal at the moment of contact.
  2. Apply the safety appraisal: "This is a real sensation, and it is safe. My brain is generating a danger signal where there is no danger." This directly targets the avidyā weighting.
  3. Hold curiosity, not alarm. Curiosity lowers the precision of the threat prior; alarm raises it. The goal is not to make the sensation leave but to change how the comparison is weighted.
05 Chapter Five

Sensation and the Eighteen Appraisals.

From contact arises vedanā — sensation, or more precisely feeling-tone: the immediate registering of experience as pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral. In the predictive model, vedanā is the precision-weighted percept that reaches awareness — the finished output, the thing the patient actually calls "my pain." It is already the product of prediction and weighting; by the time it is felt, the construction is complete.

Vasubandhu then does something remarkably fine-grained. He analyzes feeling into the eighteen upavicāras — eighteen "rangings-over" of the mind: for each of the six senses, the mind approaches its object with one of three attitudes — sympathy (drawing toward), antipathy (pushing away), or indifference. These are not the bare sensations; they are active appraisals the mind lays over sensation. The clinical translation is immediate: the upavicāras are valuation and precision-assignment — the affective tagging that decides how much a sensation matters and how the system will respond to it.

Abhidharma termClinical translation
vedanā (feeling-tone)
The precision-weighted percept delivered to awareness — the pain experience itself.
upavicāra of antipathy
Negative valuation / threat tagging that raises the precision of nociceptive prediction — the engine of pain amplification.
upavicāra of sympathy
Reward / relief valuation — the pull toward checking, fixing, and reassurance-seeking.
upavicāra of indifference (equanimous, mindful)
Down-weighted valuation — the neutral, non-reactive stance that does not feed the cascade; a target state in mindfulness-based pain therapy.

The decisive subtlety: Vasubandhu notes that an indifference "not proceeding from exact consciousness" is still a defiling appraisal — mere numbing or dissociation is not the goal. The therapeutic target is the equanimous indifference of full awareness: clearly perceiving the sensation while assigning it low threat-value. In predictive terms, this is attending to the percept while withdrawing precision from the danger prior — not suppression, but reweighting.

Clinical reading · why "don't think about it" fails

Suppression is a sympathy/antipathy appraisal in disguise — pushing the sensation away is still tagging it as dangerous, which raises precision and amplifies it (the classic rebound). The upavicāra analysis predicts this exactly: any reactive valuation, positive or negative, feeds the cascade.

The way out is the third option: full, curious attention with neutral valuation. Perceive clearly; weight gently.

"
There is a gap — however brief — between the arising of an unpleasant percept and the reactive cascade that normally follows. Train the capacity to rest in the gap, and the chain does not complete.
— Chapter 6 · The optional link
06 Chapter Six · the second hinge

The Optional Link: sensation need not become craving.

Here is the single most therapeutically important claim in the whole structure. In the standard chain, vedanā (sensation) conditions tṛṣṇā (craving). But Vasubandhu, analyzing why the awakened being (arhat) feels sensation yet generates no craving, concludes that the link from sensation to craving is conditional, not automatic.

Sensation causes craving "only when it is defiled, associated with ignorance." Remove the faulty prior and feeling no longer compels a reactive grasp.

This is the precise mechanism behind every mindfulness-based pain intervention. There is a gap — however brief — between the arising of an unpleasant percept and the reactive cascade of fear, catastrophizing, guarding, and relief-seeking that normally follows. Craving (tṛṣṇā) is the motivated, valuation-driven response; in active-inference terms it is the system's move to act so as to make its predictions come true — to escape, to brace, to confirm the danger. Train the capacity to rest in the gap, and the chain does not complete.

Abhidharma termClinical translation
tṛṣṇā (craving / thirst)
The motivated escape/relief drive — fear-avoidance, catastrophizing, the urge to fix the sensation immediately.
upādāna (grasping)
Behavioral and cognitive fixation — guarding, bracing, activity avoidance, symptom-checking, reassurance-seeking, rumination.
the gap (sensation before craving)
The brief pre-reactive window; the operative target of mindfulness, defusion, and somatic tracking.

Why does breaking this link matter so much mechanistically? Because tṛṣṇā and upādāna are how the episode consolidates. Each act of fearful guarding is active inference in the wrong direction: the body braces, movement becomes painful, and the danger prediction is confirmed — raising its precision for next time. Resting in the gap starves the cascade of the very behaviors that would otherwise teach the brain that the danger was real.

Practice · Finding the gap

Three steps between feeling and reaction.

  1. Name the feeling-tone first. Before any reaction, label only the bare vedanā: "unpleasant sensation, present." Nothing more. This interrupts automatic valuation.
  2. Notice the pull. Watch the tṛṣṇā arise — the urge to brace, escape, or check — as an event you can observe rather than obey. "There is the urge to guard."
  3. Decline the grasp, gently. Let the sensation be present without acting to fix it. Each repetition widens the gap and lowers the precision of the danger prior. You are retraining the conditional link.
07 Chapter Seven

Seeds, Roots, and the Self-Watering Tree.

How does a passing episode become a chronic condition? The Abhidharma answers with a cluster of agricultural images. Defilement is "like a seed (bīja), a root, a tree, a husk of grain." Consciousness "accompanied by desire" is described as a seed, and the conditions that surround it as the field in which it grows. Most strikingly: "the tree whose root is not cut off continues to grow even though one cuts and re-cuts its greenery."

This is a precise, pre-modern statement of neuroplastic consolidation. Every time the full cascade runs — contact, threat-weighted sensation, craving, grasping — the underlying prediction is reinforced. The bīja (seed) is the encoded prior: a pattern of synaptic weighting laid down by repetition. The bhava link ("becoming") is the learning step itself — the Hebbian consolidation by which neurons that fire together wire together, so that the danger prediction grows more precise and more easily triggered with each cycle.

The root-and-greenery principle
Cutting the greenery while the root remains
treating symptoms (the surface percept) while leaving the high-precision prior intact. The pain returns, often in a new location, because the generative source is untouched.
Cutting the root
lowering the precision of the danger prior itself, so that contact no longer produces threat-weighted sensation. This is why durable recovery targets the prediction, not the symptom — and why successful treatment often resolves several symptoms at once.

The good news hides in the same metaphor. A seed needs a field and water to grow; a prediction needs confirming behavior to stay precise. The cascade is self-watering through craving and grasping — but only as long as those behaviors continue. Withdraw the water (stop confirming the prediction through guarding, avoidance, and alarm) and even a deeply rooted prior loses precision over time. Neuroplasticity built the chronic pain; the same neuroplasticity unbuilds it. The Abhidharma's entire soteriology rests on this reversibility, and so does pain-reprocessing therapy.

The symptom-imperative trap

The upavicāra of sympathy — the pull to fix — makes patients into expert greenery-cutters: new specialists, new scans, new treatments, each offering brief relief that confirms "something is wrong with the tissue," re-watering the root. Naming this pattern explicitly is often a turning point in therapy.

IIIPart Three

Interrupting the cascade.

From the six "perpetual practices" of non-reactive awareness to a working psychotherapy for psychophysiologic pain.

08 Chapter Eight

The Three Roots and the Engine of Amplification.

The Abhidharma repeatedly returns to three root defilements — the "three poisons" — that drive the whole machinery: rāga (greed / craving toward), dveṣa (aversion / pushing away), and moha (delusion / the misperception underneath both). Vasubandhu treats moha — a near-synonym of avidyā — as the deepest, the one that makes the other two possible.

For the pain clinician these three name the exact affective-behavioral engine of symptom amplification:

Abhidharma termClinical translation
moha / avidyā (delusion)
The faulty danger prior — the false model that any of this is dangerous. The root that must be cut.
dveṣa (aversion)
Fear, fighting, and avoidance of the sensation — raises precision; the dominant amplifier in most chronic pain.
rāga (craving / grasping)
The relentless pull toward relief, cure, and certainty — fuels symptom-checking and the medical-shopping loop.

Note the structure: dveṣa and rāga are the two faces of the upavicāra of antipathy and sympathy from Chapter 5 — pushing the bad away and pulling the good toward — and both are powered by the delusion that the sensation reports a real bodily threat. This is why treatment that addresses only fear (aversion) or only reassurance (craving) tends to relapse: the root, moha, is still watering the tree.

The clinical targeting order

Work the root, manage the branches. Symptom-level coping (relaxation, pacing) calms aversion and craving and is useful early, but durable change requires lowering the precision of the danger prior itself.

Sequence: stabilize the branches enough that the patient can tolerate working the root — then work the root.

09 Chapter Nine

The Six Perpetual Practices of Non-Reactive Awareness.

To dismantle the reactive appraisals (upavicāras), Vasubandhu points to the satatavihāra — the "six perpetual methods," one for each sense. The formula is the same each time: "Having seen a visible thing with the eye, there is no sympathy and no antipathy: he remains indifferent in full mindfulness and conscious." Across all six senses, the instruction is to meet each object with clear, equanimous awareness rather than reactive valuation.

This is, almost verbatim, the core instruction of mindfulness-based pain therapy and somatic tracking. The phrase "full mindfulness and conscious" rules out the failure modes precisely: it is not distraction (the object is fully perceived), and not numbing (awareness is bright and present). It is sustained, low-valuation attention — in predictive terms, attending clearly to the percept while withholding precision from the threat appraisal. "Perpetual" is the dosing instruction: this is not a single exercise but a continuously cultivated stance, practiced across all sensory experience until it becomes the default weighting of the system.

Practice · The satatavihāra, rendered as a pain protocol

For any sensation that arises.

  1. Perceive it fully — turn toward, don't distract away. (Defeats avoidance / dveṣa.)
  2. Without sympathy — no urge to fix, cure, or seek relief. (Defeats rāga.)
  3. Without antipathy — no fear, fighting, or pushing away. (Defeats dveṣa.)
  4. In full awareness — bright, present attention; not numbing or dissociation.
  5. Conscious of safety — hold the corrective appraisal: "real sensation, no danger." (Cuts moha.)
  6. Perpetually — little and often, across the day, until equanimous weighting becomes automatic.

Vasubandhu adds a clinically reassuring note: the awakened practitioner still experiences "a satisfaction of a worldly order" — pleasant feeling does not vanish. What is arrested is only the defiled appraisal, the reactive grasp.

Translated: the goal of therapy is not anhedonia or a sensation-free body. It is a nervous system that feels fully and reacts wisely — that experiences sensation without compulsively converting every unpleasant feeling into alarm.

IVPart Four

Clinical application.

Assembling the framework into assessment, a session arc, and patient-facing language.

10 Chapter Ten

Assessment Through the Cascade.

Use the twelve-link cascade as a clinical interview map. For each link, you are listening for whether it is active and how strongly it is weighted. This locates where in the chain a given patient's pain is being sustained, and therefore which intervention to lead with.

  1. Prior (avidyā). What does the patient believe is causing the pain? Strength of structural/danger belief? History of clean imaging vs. catastrophic explanation given by prior clinicians?
  2. Attentional bias (ayoniso manasikāra). Degree of hypervigilance, body-scanning, symptom-monitoring.
  3. Percept (vedanā). Qualities, variability with mood/context/attention — high variability is strong evidence of a predictive (neuroplastic) rather than structural source.
  4. Valuation (upavicāra / dveṣa, rāga). Fear level, catastrophizing, relief-seeking and reassurance behaviors.
  5. Craving & grasping (tṛṣṇā, upādāna). Avoidance, guarding, activity restriction, medical shopping, checking.
  6. Consolidation (bhava). Chronicity, spread to new sites, symptom imperative — evidence of a deeply rooted, high-precision prior.
Diagnostic hinge · evidence of a predictive source

After medical red flags are excluded, these features point toward a brain-generated (neuroplastic) source the framework can treat:

  • Symptoms that move, mirror, or spread
  • Vary with stress, attention, or emotion
  • Began at a stressful time
  • Show inconsistency with anatomy
  • Coexist with other psychophysiologic conditions

Each is a sign that the percept is tracking the prior, not the tissue.

11 Chapter Eleven

A Session Arc.

A reusable structure that walks the patient from the founding thesis to the operative practice. Early sessions emphasize the first three movements; later sessions live in the last two.

Movement 1 · The world is built

Establish, experientially, that perception is constructed (use simple perceptual illusions; the placebo/nocebo literature; the patient's own context-dependent pain). Plant the founding reframe: the pain is real and brain-generated. This is the first loosening of moha.

Movement 2 · Name the cascade

Map the patient's own experience onto the links. Patients consistently find it relieving to see that fear, guarding, and checking are understandable, mechanical responses — not personal failings — and that the chain has reachable break-points.

Movement 3 · Lower the precision of the prior

The core change work: repeated, embodied demonstrations of safety. Somatic tracking, graded exposure to feared movement, and the explicit safety appraisal all teach the brain to stop trusting the danger prediction — cutting the root of Chapter 7.

Movement 4 · Find the gap

Train the conditional link of Chapter 6: practice resting in the window between sensation and reaction, declining the reactive grasp (tṛṣṇā), starving the cascade of confirming behavior.

Movement 5 · Make it perpetual

Generalize the satatavihāra stance into daily life — brief, frequent, across all the senses — until equanimous, low-threat weighting is the nervous system's default. Relapses are reframed as flares to be met with the same stance, not as failure.

Patient-facing language · one paragraph

"Your pain is 100% real. It's not coming from damage in the tissue — your scans confirm that. It's coming from your brain, which has learned to predict danger in that part of your body and is generating a very real alarm signal. The good news is that what's learned can be unlearned. Our job together is to teach your brain, through direct experience, that it's safe — so it can turn the alarm down. We're going to do that by changing how you respond to the sensations, not by fighting them."

12 Chapter Twelve · Quick reference

The Whole Translation.

A one-table summary of the conceptual bridge built in this handbook.

Abhidharma termClinical translation
The world arises from action (karma)
Experience is the output of an active generative model, not a passive recording.
pratītyasamutpāda (dependent origination)
The staged generative cascade that builds and consolidates a chronic-pain episode.
avidyā / moha (ignorance, delusion)
The faulty, high-precision danger prior at the root of the cascade.
ayoniso manasikāra (incorrect attention)
Threat-biased attentional sampling that distorts the percept as it forms.
sparśa (contact)
Prediction meets evidence; prediction error is computed and weighted.
vedanā (feeling-tone)
The precision-weighted percept reaching awareness — the pain itself.
upavicāra (the appraisals)
Valuation / precision-assignment: how much the sensation is made to matter.
tṛṣṇā → upādāna (craving → grasping)
The reactive escape/fix drive and its behaviors (fear-avoidance, guarding, checking).
bhava (becoming)
Neuroplastic consolidation — each cycle raises the precision of the prior.
bīja · root-and-tree (seeds)
Encoded priors; treating symptoms = cutting greenery; cutting the root = lowering the prior's precision.
satatavihāra (six perpetual practices)
Sustained, equanimous, low-valuation awareness — mindfulness-based pain therapy / somatic tracking.
the optional link (sensation ≠ craving)
The pre-reactive gap; resting in it interrupts the chain and is the operative target of practice.

"The variety of the world arises from action."

This handbook is a conceptual adaptation. It borrows the analytic architecture of Vasubandhu's Abhidharmakośabhāṣyam (Chapters III–IV, Pruden English translation of the La Vallée Poussin French) as a scaffold for a modern, mechanistic account of psychophysiologic disorders.

It makes no claim to represent Buddhist doctrine, nor to constitute medical advice. Clinical decisions remain the responsibility of qualified practitioners working with patients whose structural disease has been appropriately excluded.

© Karuna Labs Inc.  ·  The Predictive Mind in Pain  ·  v1.0